![]() ![]() To leverage strong generative priors and address challenges such as unstable training and lack of interpretability for GAN-based generative methods, we propose a novel fusion algorithm based on the denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM). Efficiency problems with using -modality image fusion aims to combine different modalities to produce fused images that retain the complementary features of each modality, such as functional highlights and texture details.How to propose a special issue for a journal?.How to Detect and Classify Metamorphic Malware with Sequential Pattern Mining (MalSPM).Philippe Fournier-Viger is a full professor working in China and founder of the SPMF open source data mining software. ![]() What do you think? I would like to read your opinion in the comment section below. Thus, I feel that it is my duty to share what I do as open-source code (when possible). This has many advantages: (1) other people can use my algorithms and compare with them without having to spend time to re-implement the same algorithms again, (2) people can use my algorithms for some real applications and it is useful to them, (3) this increase the number of citations of my papers and (4) it convince reviewers that results in my papers can be reproduced.Īnother reason why I share the code of my research is that as a professor, much of my research is funded by the government through the university or grants. I put the code and data in my open-source SPMF software, unless it is related to a commercial project and that I cannot share the code. Personally, I release the source code and data of almost all the papers where I am the corresponding author. Thus, a solution could be to make this requirements more strict for conferences and journals at the time of submission. Unless there is some confidential or commerical restrictions on research projects, it should be possible for many researchers to publish their code and data at the time of submiting their papers. However, in computer science, this should not be so much of a problem as code can be easily shared. In some other fields such as cancer research, it was pointed out that several studies are difficult to reproduce. Why I talk about this? While, I am not convince that this website is a good idea, I think that it raises an important debate about reproducibility of research. This is a good point, as it is not complicated to create an online repository and upload code… An undergraduate student on Reddit also said that he does not understand why providing code is not a requirement when submiting a paper. I don’t know if it is true, but there are certainly many. And some people claimed on Reddit that at least 50% to 90% of papers are not reproducible based on their experience. In fact, there is a website called Paper with Code that does that for machine learning, although it is not exhaustive. On Reddit a comment was that it is “ Easier to compile a list of reproducable” papers. The website owner of PapersWithoutCode has indicated on Reddit that s/he will at least take some steps to prevent problems from happening such as to verify the information about the sender, and to inform the first author of a paper and giving him at least one week to answer before adding it to the list. But at the same time, there are many papers that simply cannot be reproduced and many people may waste time trying to reproduce them. Personally, I am not sure that creating such website is a good idea because some papers may be added to this list and it may be undeserved in some cases, and have an impact on the reputation of some researchers. For some of thes papers on that list, some people mentioned that they even tried to contact the authors of papers but got some dodgy responses and that some promised to add the code to GitHub with a “coming soon” notice, before eventually deleting the repository. At the time of writing this blog post, there are only four papers on the list. The list of papers without code can be found here. Then, the owner of the website first send an e-mail to the first author of the paper to give a chance to provide an explanation before the paper is added to the list of non-reproducible papers. On the website, someone can submit a report about a paper that is not reproducible by indicating several information such as how much time was spent on trying, what is the title of the paper and its authors. The goal of this website is apparently to save time by indicating which papers cannot be reproduced and perhaps even to put pressure on the authors to make reproducible papers in the future. To address this issue, some Reddit user launched a website called Papers Without code to list all papers that are found to have results that cannot be reproduced. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |